Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Archive for all MOT match day threads including match previews, in game chat, reports and ratings.
Fulham v Leeds United
Fulham
Fulham
1–0
Premier League
13/09/2025
Craven Cottage
Leeds United
Leeds United
All-time record vs Fulham
65
Played
26
Won
16
Drawn
23
Lost
+16
GD
40%
Win %
Away record
34
Played
11
Won
7
Drawn
16
Lost
-4
GD
32%
Win %
DateGroundScoreCompetition
22/04/2023 Craven Cottage 2–1 L Premier League
28/02/2023 Craven Cottage 2–0 L FA Cup, 5th Round
23/10/2022 Elland Road 2–3 L Premier League
21/09/2021 Craven Cottage 0–0 D Carabao Cup, 3rd Round
19/03/2021 Craven Cottage 1–2 W Premier League
All-time top scorers vs Fulham
#PlayerGoals
1 John Charles 8
2 Jimmy Greenhoff 4
3 Patrick Bamford 4
4 Tommy Wright 4
5 Albert Johanneson 3
Starting XI
Substitutes
Unused Substitutes
16 Meslier
24 Justin
15 Bijol
44 Gruev
22 Tanaka
User avatar
Carrick Dave
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 6717
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Carrick Dave »

Johnsie123 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 7:26 pm These games are the ones we cannot afford to lose why arronson over Gnotto no idea why he would do that unless Gnotto injured,but if arronson was as bad as people are saying Farke should have changed it around then rather than the usual 65 min everyone knows that is what he does he needs to improvise or it will be his down fall and ours more importantly .
Maybe save the criticism till after you've watched the game Johnsie? Then you can make your own mind up.
Last edited by Carrick Dave on Sat Sep 13, 2025 7:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nord VPN
Stream games in safety! Get NordVPN with up to 75% off + 3 months free
Get NordVPN →
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154705
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

Johnsie123 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 7:26 pm These games are the ones we cannot afford to lose why arronson over Gnotto no idea why he would do that unless Gnotto injured,but if arronson was as bad as people are saying Farke should have changed it around then rather than the usual 65 min everyone knows that is what he does he needs to improvise or it will be his down fall and ours more importantly .
Aaronson wasn't as bad as some are saying on here.

13 - good pieces of play.
04 - errors
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154705
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

I like this lad Jack, doesn't down everything that is Leeds as some seem to do.

He attends all our home games, so a man of my own heart.


User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154705
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

Carrick Dave wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 7:30 pm Maybe save the criticism till after you've watched the game Johnsie? Then you can make your own mind up.
Another one who slags Leeds off at every opportunity.
User avatar
Carrick Dave
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 6717
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Carrick Dave »

1964white wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 7:42 pm Another one who slags Leeds off at every opportunity.
Thing is, we were really quite good today, we went toe to toe with an established side and got the better of it over 90 minutes, in spite of the fact that they could bring on the stardust element that we lack.

But no points, so Leeds must be sh1te.
DDB220
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 7022
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:17 am

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by DDB220 »

Irish Ian wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 7:10 pm So what was your take on Robbie Evans report from last week?
Some folk refuse to accept the level of debt we were carrying. We sold Archie to stay within PSR for the 23/24 season. We then sold Rutter and would not have made a significant profit. Cresswell and Summerville would have been profit, but that is pretty much about it. We had 90 million of debt, including staged payments to consider on players Orta signed.

We have spent 70 million on transfers and then there are the new players wages to factor. Signing a player out of contract likely comes with a significant signing on fee. Particularly in the case of DCL. The existing players will have received a significant uplift in wages following promotion.

There is no financial comparison to be made when we were promoted the last time, as we were pretty much debt free. Ironically like Sunderland this season, who also sold Bellingham for pure profit.
User avatar
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 41533
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Cjay »

Irish Ian wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 7:13 pm ID Have been happy for Rama to stay, his leaving is the first time I have disagreed with Farkes decisions on players.

We did look decent today and I reckon we will conjure up some magic from the attackers att some point.
Hopefully so, we knew it would be harder this season and more emphasis on team play and coaching to make the difference so let's Hope.

It's good to be competitive but competitive teams have been relegated before, goals matter most.
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 41533
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Cjay »

DDB220 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:16 pm Some folk refuse to accept the level of debt we were carrying. We sold Archie to stay within PSR for the 23/24 season. We then sold Rutter and would not have made a significant profit. Cresswell and Summerville would have been profit, but that is pretty much about it. We had 90 million of debt, including staged payments to consider on players Orta signed.

We have spent 70 million on transfers and then there are the new players wages to factor. Signing a player out of contract likely comes with a significant signing on fee. Particularly in the case of DCL. The existing players will have received a significant uplift in wages following promotion.

There is no financial comparison to be made when we were promoted the last time, as we were pretty much debt free. Ironically like Sunderland this season, who also sold Bellingham for pure profit.
Technically you could sell a player end of the season to make ffp tbf (same as we did when we forced Archie out).

And we were told Rutter was a surprise and unnecessary sale (so we should have more room than we expected but perhaps a bit of pr fluff who knows).

What confuses me is the bids for Paixao and Muniz, nearly £60mil, where was that coming from?

They said they would have had to sell someone , but who? Even The Athletic have been really scarce on any interest in our players so where were these offers coming from? You can't magic bids that aren't coming so how did we know we'd get some?


What if no bids came?

If we are tight against ffp would you really spend £60mil in the hope someone comes in to buy your players? Seems very risky.

That confuses me.

Had we had whispers of interest on James for example you'd understand it but wasn't any, so how were they going to guarantee these funds coming in that we desperately needed for these deals?
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
andrewjohnsmith
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 13036
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:58 pm
Location: California (Donny Born-n-Bred)

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by andrewjohnsmith »

1964white wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 6:51 pm Glad you complimented Gudmundsson, he looks a quality left-back, Dave

Yes, there were plenty of positives that far outweighed the negatives.
More agree. Maybe that should be tomorrow's poll :)
User avatar
andrewjohnsmith
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 13036
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:58 pm
Location: California (Donny Born-n-Bred)

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by andrewjohnsmith »

Johnsie123 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 7:26 pm These games are the ones we cannot afford to lose why arronson over Gnotto no idea why he would do that unless Gnotto injured,but if arronson was as bad as people are saying Farke should have changed it around then rather than the usual 65 min everyone knows that is what he does he needs to improvise or it will be his down fall and ours more importantly .
Aarsonson was unspectacular but not "bad."

We were 0-0 when he went off and I'm sure Farke would have taken that
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154705
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

Carrick Dave wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 7:59 pm Thing is, we were really quite good today, we went toe to toe with an established side and got the better of it over 90 minutes, in spite of the fact that they could bring on the stardust element that we lack.

But no points, so Leeds must be sh1te.
That seems to be the consensus.
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 78714
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by The Subhuman »

I really don't want relegation again and trusting to faith, like most here are, really isn't me.
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
User avatar
CUSSIE01
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 9655
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2023 6:45 am
Location: Where God finally got it right.

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by CUSSIE01 »

1964white wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:00 pm That seems to be the consensus.
Not from me, naturally disappointed but not in our performance. I thought we contained Fulham until their late subs turned the game and were the better team for large parts of the game but we really need to find a way to score when we’re on top.

A point today & next week would have been ok but we could do with a win v Wolves to keep the baying hoards happy.
“ If you’re going to try, go all the way. Otherwise don’t even start “ Charles Bukowski.
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154705
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

CUSSIE01 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:01 pm Not from me, naturally disappointed but not in our performance. I thought we contained Fulham until their late subs turned the game and were the better team for large parts of the game but we really need to find a way to score when we’re on top.

A point today & next week would have been ok but we could do with a win v Wolves to keep the baying hoards happy.
Nor me too, Cussie.

We were decent today.
User avatar
weasel
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 19601
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
Location: Firmly on the Danny-Magnet

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by weasel »

Cjay wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:26 pm Technically you could sell a player end of the season to make ffp tbf (same as we did when we forced Archie out).

And we were told Rutter was a surprise and unnecessary sale (so we should have more room than we expected but perhaps a bit of pr fluff who knows).

What confuses me is the bids for Paixao and Muniz, nearly £60mil, where was that coming from?

They said they would have had to sell someone , but who? Even The Athletic have been really scarce on any interest in our players so where were these offers coming from? You can't magic bids that aren't coming so how did we know we'd get some?


What if no bids came?

If we are tight against ffp would you really spend £60mil in the hope someone comes in to buy your players? Seems very risky.

That confuses me.

Had we had whispers of interest on James for example you'd understand it but wasn't any, so how were they going to guarantee these funds coming in that we desperately needed for these deals?
But there is no guarantee you could sell a player for the money you need. Many clubs would want to wait till July 1st, or later, to buy so you may end up unable to sell anyone of sufficient value or having to take lower offers simply to get money in.

We sold Rutter but we wouldn't have made a huge profit as we would have still owed, PSR wise, for the remaining years on his contrac. So say we bought him for £30m on a 4 1/2 year deal. We'd still owe around £20m on him. As such if we sold him for £35m it is only £15m coming in. Likely also that as we bought him cos he was too good an opportunity to miss it may have meant we went over budget when we signed him i.e. we had no money to spend but could make exemptions for a special player.

Evans said that if a high quality player was available we'd sign them and then have to sell someone - but we wouldn't look to sell one of our 'crown jewels' until we'd signed a high quality player. As such if we'd signed one of the two players mentioned then likely we would have then had to sell someone like Struyjk or Gnonto where the profit would be big. So likely we'd have been in the position of letting clubs know that we were open to offers and then hoping to sell one or two players.
Cjay wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 4:23 pm I've pretended to support a team that's been crap for most of my life as part of a long term plan
Victor_Notts-17 wrote: Mon Jun 01, 2026 7:03 pm Did you post them because there's something wrong with your brain
User avatar
weasel
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 19601
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
Location: Firmly on the Danny-Magnet

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by weasel »

andrewjohnsmith wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:34 pm Aarsonson was unspectacular but not "bad."

We were 0-0 when he went off and I'm sure Farke would have taken that
Similar to last year Aaronsen helps whatever system we play work. He does this through his all round game and energy rather than by endless goals and asistes. He was part of the team selection that bossed the first half and like you said we were at 0-0 whe he went off. He was unlucky not to score, not much more he could have done with his effort on target.

Fulham's subs were better than ours. That isn't a slight on Farke's decisions but on our relative strength.
Cjay wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 4:23 pm I've pretended to support a team that's been crap for most of my life as part of a long term plan
Victor_Notts-17 wrote: Mon Jun 01, 2026 7:03 pm Did you post them because there's something wrong with your brain
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154705
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

Offensively, Fulham produced no more than us!

Screenshot 2025-09-13 23.45.04.png
DDB220
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 7022
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:17 am

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by DDB220 »

Cjay wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:26 pm Technically you could sell a player end of the season to make ffp tbf (same as we did when we forced Archie out).

And we were told Rutter was a surprise and unnecessary sale (so we should have more room than we expected but perhaps a bit of pr fluff who knows).

What confuses me is the bids for Paixao and Muniz, nearly £60mil, where was that coming from?

They said they would have had to sell someone , but who? Even The Athletic have been really scarce on any interest in our players so where were these offers coming from? You can't magic bids that aren't coming so how did we know we'd get some?


What if no bids came?

If we are tight against ffp would you really spend £60mil in the hope someone comes in to buy your players? Seems very risky.

That confuses me.

Had we had whispers of interest on James for example you'd understand it but wasn't any, so how were they going to guarantee these funds coming in that we desperately needed for these deals?
The bids were not simultaneous. We went for the lad Sunderland got and failed, then Muniz and that failed and then we went for Paixao. That failed and we ended buying Okafor. I believe we still have money, but probably no more than 10-15 million.

We may have been in for a quality forward and winger initially. But the plan changed. I would not be surprised if the signing on DCL included a hefty multi million signing on fee. I believe we spent the lion’s share of what we had available.
User avatar
malcolmw
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 3702
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2023 4:20 am
Location: Qualicum Beach, BC, Canada

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by malcolmw »

Cjay wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 5:16 pm Missed the end.

Felt we were well organised off the ball for much of the game, good press.

Tidy on it without being threatening.

Fulham were coming into it more as I left.

Frustrating again.

But the lack of quality is obvious, we don't look like scoring a goal and when your aiming to keep it tight and hope to nick something it's risky.

The positives were evident but the negatives are equally so.

Where do our goals come from when you can't really create chances?
Yeah. We have to stop running sideways on attack. Aaronson is the worst. :evil: Longstaff had a moment that showed the forwards how to do things - great shot off the crossbar.

I noticed in the 'in training' video last week they were doing some routines to offload and shoot quickly. So the squad are fully aware of the issue. We are going to have to get the forwards we have scoring and nicking a few over the coming few games. We just don't have Kevin type creativity.

Its a funny thing though. In all sports, these sorts of issues become a mental sticking point. We see it in cricket teams, golfers, tennis players and more. Its not choking exactly, it's just like facing a brick wall - in our case right now it's "how the f*** are we going to score a goal?" :roflmao:
Just takes one moment to break through. Let's hope it comes against Wolves.
danhirons
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3881
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:21 pm

Re: Fulham v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by danhirons »

andrewjohnsmith wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 4:34 pm You said you missed the game. So what are you basing that information on?
Good point! :lol:

Bis cameos beforehand and the fact that he was pants in serie A and didnt do anything today. Still early days though but I have little hope for him
Nord VPN
Stream games in safety! Get NordVPN with up to 75% off + 3 months free
Get NordVPN →
Post Reply