We would have stayed up, irrespective of that goal.
Just saying

We would have stayed up, irrespective of that goal.



Continuing in the fine tradition of this club's financial dealings....Johnthewhite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 16, 2026 5:56 pm Yea, why didn't we offer him a five year contract on £100k per week.
Oh wait![]()



Indeed but it confirmed it and settled the nerves,if Burnley had equalised and Jack hadn't scored we would have been relegated on GD That goal finished off a very exciting afternoon,I can remember running around the room like a nutter.Barlow Boy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 16, 2026 5:27 pm We would have stayed up, irrespective of that goal.
Just saying![]()

The contract thing looks like another Orta / Radz spectacularCHAPELALLMAN wrote: ↑Fri Jan 16, 2026 6:05 pm Continuing in the fine tradition of this club's financial dealings....
Nothing seemingly learnt from the likes of the Seth Johnson pay and contract terms, plus a few other dreadful player deals since then...it's what we do.

All I can tell you is that I watched that game on my laptop in one of those over the Indian Ocean cabins (with swimming pool!) in the Maldives and yelled my head off. What neighbours were probably unimpressed but I didn't careTyzy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 16, 2026 6:42 pm Indeed but it confirmed it and settled the nerves,if Burnley had equalised and Jack hadn't scored we would have been relegated on GD That goal finished off a very exciting afternoon,I can remember running around the room like a nutter.
I'm not a fan of his by the way.

Pullhard wrote: ↑Sat Jan 17, 2026 9:43 am The contract thing looks like another Orta / Radz spectacular
I’m not a fan of Jack but:
- it’s not his fault the club pulled him out of the room when he was about to sign for Leicester
- it’s not his fault the club then gave him a big contract
- he was loaned out for 2 seasons when we were in the Championship. Suited the club as we couldn’t afford his wages.
- you might question his impact on the pitch which is trending downwards. Don’t think his on pitch effort can be questioned though. He gives what he has.
- and of course we don’t get to choose our parents …. His mum hasn’t endeared herself to Leeds fans
I hope he moves on - it’s better for the club and hopefully better for him.

Tough day at the office thatPhoenixUnited wrote: ↑Sat Jan 17, 2026 10:01 am All I can tell you is that I watched that game on my laptop in one of those over the Indian Ocean cabins (with swimming pool!) in the Maldives and yelled my head off. What neighbours were probably unimpressed but I didn't care![]()

Very fairly summed upPullhard wrote: ↑Sat Jan 17, 2026 9:43 am The contract thing looks like another Orta / Radz spectacular
I’m not a fan of Jack but:
- it’s not his fault the club pulled him out of the room when he was about to sign for Leicester
- it’s not his fault the club then gave him a big contract
- he was loaned out for 2 seasons when we were in the Championship. Suited the club as we couldn’t afford his wages.
- you might question his impact on the pitch which is trending downwards. Don’t think his on pitch effort can be questioned though. He gives what he has.
- and of course we don’t get to choose our parents …. His mum hasn’t endeared herself to Leeds fans
I hope he moves on - it’s better for the club and hopefully better for him.



Victor_Notts-17 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 7:03 pm Did you post them because there's something wrong with your brain

Agreed. Would like nothing more than to get that wage bill off our books.



Before we sent Llorente out on loan to Roma, we signed him on a long term contract, and I was thinking at the time that there must be some very cerebral logic going on here that's a few levels above my melonJohnthewhite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 16, 2026 5:56 pm Yea, why didn't we offer him a five year contract on £100k per week.
Oh wait![]()

He'll certainly need plenty of that