White Riot wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2026 6:49 pm
Yeah, they came with a game plan and executed it well. They were here for the points and we're quite happy to trash the match.
With Farke's team selection and no risk approach he handed the initiative to them.
This wasn't Man City, or Arsenal we were playing and even if it was we were at home and that's where I expect we take the game to the opposition.
It's hard to seize the initiative when your coach selects 9 defenders

Hence all the sideways and backwards passing.
Le Bris realised the game was there for the taking and brought on Xhaka, and Isidor to effect the win. No response from Farke until we conceded.
This ultra safe approach doesn't work, their stand in goalie, on his EPL debut, was hardly worked. We had Ampadu commit a knucklehead action and hand them their one shot on target.
Darlow faced one shot on target, a very weak penalty and still conceded. That's Meslier levels of inept goalkeeping.
It was cowardly from Farke on every level.
Team selection, not adapting at all to the difference between playing Man City and an injury hit Sunderland (almost as if he was afraid of making a mistake in selection).
So kept the ultra defensive creatively lacking selection
Even his subs were practically identical to the ones vs Man City right down to the time they came on (same players as well I think).
Worst though was it was clearly a ploddyball resumption which with such an ultra defensive team was never going to work.
The players who may have helped were sat on the bench or not in the squad.
Sunderland may have sat off a bit but you can still go direct and play for 2nd balls as has worked.
But no we went back to ploddyball, and not only that but DF was so happy with the possession being over 70% he kept it how it was for 20 odd minutes.
As Beren said in his article it's the type of game we've seen before, had hoped it was over but no.
Decided to revert to type vs an injury hit Sunderland
Hopefully got out of his system now.