The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

For everything Leeds United related and everything not - Have your say... the Marching on Together way!
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.

Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11895
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Breakfast Debate The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by Ellandback1 »



Good Morning. It's Friday 29th May, and here are the latest headlines from Elland Road...


Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Leeds United faced a baptism of fire upon their return to the Premier League last season, ultimately prevailing in their bid for survival thanks in no small part to the contributions of three pivotal figures: Ethan Ampadu, Anton Stach, and Gabriel Gudmundsson. The trio established themselves as reliable performers throughout a campaign that tested the resolve of every member of Daniel Farke's squad, with the Welshman Ampadu leading by example as captain whilst German midfielder Stach and Swedish full-back Gudmundsson offered quality and consistency in their respective roles. However, their fine form has not gone unnoticed across the continent, and now Leeds find themselves at a familiar crossroads that confronts many clubs of their stature.

The financial dimension of this situation cannot be overlooked. Stach and Gudmundsson arrived at Elland Road last summer for a combined fee of approximately £27.4 million, representing significant investments by the club's ownership, whilst Ampadu's move from Chelsea in the summer of 2023, initially costing around £7 million, has proven to be one of the club's shrewdest pieces of business in recent years. In an ideal world, Leeds would constructing a squad capable of building upon their survival success and pushing further up the Premier League table, and that vision naturally includes retaining their finest assets.

Football's economic realities often dictate a different path, and should substantial offers arrive from Europe's elite, the club's hierarchy would be neglecting their duties if they did not at least give such proposals due consideration. The challenge lies in finding the balance between sporting ambition and financial pragmatism, a negotiation that will define Leeds United's summer business and perhaps their trajectory for seasons to come.





Whites Chase Brazilian Star Mauro Júnior in Transfer Battle

Leeds United have initiated formal transfer discussions for PSV Eindhoven's versatile Brazilian fullback Mauro Júnior, but face considerable competition as they look to strengthen their squad ahead of next season. The 27yo, who operates comfortably across multiple positions including left-back, right-back, central midfield and the left side of midfield has attracted significant attention across Europe due to his accessible release clause, with reports from Dutch outlets Voetbal International and Eindhovens Dagblad confirming that the transfer race has intensifying. Portuguese giants FC Porto have emerged as principal rivals for Júnior's signature, while several clubs from Spain and Italy are also monitoring the situation with keen interest.

For Leeds, the appeal of acquiring Mauro Júnior extends far beyond his tactical flexibility. The Brazilian has enjoyed a highly productive season in the Eredivisie, contributing 11 assists and one goal across 37 appearances while accumulating over 200 appearances for PSV during his tenure, accumulating four league title medals. His experience at the highest domestic level, combined with his age and multiple-position capability, would provide Daniel Farke with valuable options across both full-back berths and the midfield engine room as the club seeks to establish itself back among England's elite.

However, PSV are waging an aggressive campaign to retain their vice-captain. The Dutch club are currently working to push through a contract extension that would completely remove the release clause from his agreement, hoping to make any potential departure prohibitively expensive. From Júnior's perspective, the decision represents a genuine career crossroads; sources suggest the player is acutely aware that a high-profile move to the Premier League could substantially boost his chances of breaking into the Brazilian national team setup, a long-held ambition that currently remains unrealised.





Leeds set to offload Ramazani

Leeds United are preparing to part ways with Belgian winger Largie Ramazani this summer, with the club ready to entertain offers in the region of £10 million. The decision comes despite Ramazani's productive loan spell at Valencia last season, where he demonstrated the attacking qualities that once prompted Leeds to invest in his signature two years ago. The Whites originally signed the 25yo from Almería for the same £10 million fee they are now seeking to recoup, though his time at Elland Road has been defined by limited opportunities and growing tactical concerns that ultimately overshadowed his undeniable raw talent.

Despite showing flashes of his explosive pace and technical ability during his time at Leeds, Ramazani never secured the trust of manager Daniel Farke, who preferred alternative options in the attacking third. Ramazani's struggles with off-the-ball work rate and defensive discipline have raised questions not just from Farke, but from fans and pundits too. While his speed and ball-carrying ability make him a genuine attacking threat, the inability or unwillingness to track back and contribute defensively has created internal concerns that clubs have found difficult to overlook.

Almería, his former club, retain a 15%n sell-on clause, meaning any transfer would trigger a payout to the Spanish side. This arrangement complicates Leeds' hopes of maximizing their return, as the selling club must factor in the percentage that would be owed to Almería. Nevertheless, with Ramazani firmly out of Farke's plans and the club looking to reshape their squad for the upcoming season, Leeds are determined to find a new home for the Belgian international, even if it means accepting a financial loss on the original investment.


User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 155162
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by 1964white »

Omg!

Selling Ramazani will upset several of our members.
User avatar
Ratscoot
Manager
Manager
Posts: 4221
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:52 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by Ratscoot »

Morning EB et all

We should bring Ramazani back into the fold, give him a season to see how he's improved, as we'll need more squad players next season, plus then as a Prem player his value will increase
A bumble bee under the laws of physics shouldnt be able to fly, but it does because no one has told it that it can't
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 23126
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by SG90 »

Whenever I see us linked to a Brazilian, I get excited thinking it'll be a baller wonderkid playmaker 😍 and then it tends to be an average journeyman.
User avatar
Pullhard
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 2972
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:23 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by Pullhard »

SG90 wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 11:10 am Whenever I see us linked to a Brazilian, I get excited thinking it'll be a baller wonderkid playmaker 😍 and then it tends to be an average journeyman.
You must have been excited about Perri
User avatar
Pullhard
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 2972
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:23 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by Pullhard »

I also see Mallorca were relegated from La Liga

Likely to hinder an injured Joseph staying there.
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 23126
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by SG90 »

Pullhard wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 11:40 am You must have been excited about Perri
Nah.... But Raphinha I was :love:
User avatar
Clitheroe White
First Team
First Team
Posts: 1678
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2022 8:38 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by Clitheroe White »

1964white wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 9:19 am Omg!

Selling Ramazani will upset several of our members.
Yes - me, the lads got talent. Must be something that Herr Farke sees that puts him off.
User avatar
Barlow Boy
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 11769
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:32 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by Barlow Boy »

SG90 wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 11:10 am Whenever I see us linked to a Brazilian, I get excited thinking it'll be a baller wonderkid playmaker 😍 and then it tends to be an average journeyman.
or Perri.
Don’t cry because you said goodbye to your pet, smile because you said hello
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 23126
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by SG90 »

Clitheroe White wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 12:25 pm Yes - me, the lads got talent. Must be something that Herr Farke sees that puts him off.
Probably upset that he isn't given a chance
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 23126
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by SG90 »

Article on the BBC said we were the only club to not have a VAR error in our favour and had 4 go against us. Typical 🤔
User avatar
Carrick Dave
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 6744
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by Carrick Dave »

Clitheroe White wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 12:25 pm Yes - me, the lads got talent. Must be something that Herr Farke sees that puts him off.
Clickbait allegations that his recent attitude and social media activity has alienated both management and players, and Valencia have pulled away from a deal for him for now at least.

https://c.newsnow.co.uk/A/1314604984?-1 ... top_latest

https://thehardtackle.com/transfer-news ... -ramazani/
User avatar
GreennWhite
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 3350
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2023 11:02 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by GreennWhite »

Farke works with these players every day in training and gets to know them much better than anyone on here ever will do. If he decides that a certain player isnt what he wants or needs then...tough s**t.
It doesnt always sit well with some fans, but so far Farke has got more things right, than wrong.
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 78995
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by The Subhuman »

SG90 wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 1:58 pm Article on the BBC said we were the only club to not have a VAR error in our favour and had 4 go against us. Typical 🤔
Doesn't say that.

Fulham, Burnley, Us and Liverpool had none in favour but that's what you hope for.

Manchester United, Sunderland, Brighton & Hove Albion, Everton and especially Crystal Palace were the sinned against

Arsenal, Chelsea, Newcastle and Bournemouth won the VAR lottery

Plus or minus one is in allowable tolerances imo. VAR is not perfect as it's subjective and still gives the benifit of the doubt to the refs initial decision


https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/ar ... gzl2gmvrzo
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
DDB220
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 7069
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:17 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Friday 29th May) Leeds United's Summer Retention Challenge

Post by DDB220 »

Clitheroe White wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 12:25 pm Yes - me, the lads got talent. Must be something that Herr Farke sees that puts him off.
Talent is wasted if a player does not have the right attitude and team ethic.
No point being able to do a step over and then lose the ball in a dangerous position.
I have no idea why Farke sent him on loan last season and used him sparingly after he started brightly.
There is an issue and how players react to managers feedback tends to influence their future at the club.
I will be very very surprised if he returns to the fold. We may sell him under value but that is probably the only viable outcome.
Some may dwell on this if he does well next season but just because if may work out for him elsewhere does not mean we would have benefited from his return.
Post Reply