Bates on O'Dea/O'Dea gone
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 154882
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
Bates on O'Dea/O'Dea gone
Last edited by 1964white on Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Bakerjamessteven
- First Team

- Posts: 2461
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 6:49 pm
- Location: Rochester Kent
Bates on O'Dea
I do like the lad. But he's no good to LUFC if he's not playing because he's always getting sent off or suspended. Get rid1964white wrote:http://www.newsnow.co.uk/A/562783122?-11130
Warnock was furious with him too
Time to go !
- weasel
- Superstar

- Posts: 19631
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
- Location: Firmly on the Danny-Magnet
Re: Bates on O'Dea
He is sh*te and ill discliplined - get rid off.
Victor_Notts-17 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 7:03 pm Did you post them because there's something wrong with your brain
-
white.riot
Re: Bates on O'Dea
Shame to blame O'Dea - we get someone different sent off every week under the new regime. Dirty Leeds - I think Colin may have bought into the legend.
- YorkshireSquare
- Administrator

- Posts: 14999
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 1:34 pm
- Twitter: @motforum
- Location: Leeds
- Contact:
Re: Bates on O'Dea
He's ok O'Dea, needs a wise head next to him though.
-
Drs.Dad
- Manager

- Posts: 3048
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:20 pm
Re: Bates on O'Dea
It's that famous sign...... you know, the "Keep On Fighting" one....... they have just not understood the real meaning behind it!
:mrgreen:
:mrgreen:

-
ldj90
- Subs Bench

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:06 pm
- Twitter: @LiamJarman1
Re: Bates on O'Dea
I would still have him!
-
Drs.Dad
- Manager

- Posts: 3048
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:20 pm
Re: Bates on O'Dea
ldj90 wrote:I would still have him!
Unless Colin has multiple other quality centre backs lined up, I agree, he'd be a good squad member.

-
ldj90
- Subs Bench

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:06 pm
- Twitter: @LiamJarman1
Re: Bates on O'Dea
Exactly. I'm quite excited by the prospect of lees and O'Dea developing together. Still need another more experienced head though i feel.Drs.Dad wrote:
Unless Colin has multiple other quality centre backs lined up, I agree, he'd be a good squad member.
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 154882
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
Re: Bates on O'Dea
I'm not excited one bit !ldj90 wrote:
Exactly. I'm quite excited by the prospect of lees and O'Dea developing together. Still need another more experienced head though i feel.
- weasel
- Superstar

- Posts: 19631
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
- Location: Firmly on the Danny-Magnet
Re: Bates on O'Dea
I'm 100% with you on this 641964white wrote:
I'm not excited one bit !
Victor_Notts-17 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 7:03 pm Did you post them because there's something wrong with your brain
- 92champs
- Reserve Player

- Posts: 282
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:28 pm
- Location: Co. Galway
Re: Bates on O'Dea
Well, since O'Dea's main alternative is to go back to a team who will probably win their league with ease and have little competitiveness, will he want to go back there? But, if we can get better CBs there is probably no need for him. Harsh maybe, but that's football, a ruthless business
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 154882
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
Re: Bates on O'Dea
Good to hear Weaselweasel wrote:
I'm 100% with you on this 64![]()
To be fair Lees & O'Dea have probably been our most consistent pairing but i always feel there is a mistake in O'Dea's game, he's done ok, we need to replace him with a better quality centre back, our defence requires major surgery !
- Gurj
- Manager

- Posts: 2755
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 11:22 am
- Location: Birmingham
Re: Bates on O'Dea
I wouldnt personally keep O-Dea at Leeds beyond the end of this season, nothing to do with the sending off, just that we need a really dominant and pacey central defender.
Whilst Lee's should definitely stay, I dont honestly think he is good enough, yet, to make up a promotion winning central defensive partnership. Squad player for me next year....someone who can cover RB and CB positions.
Whilst Lee's should definitely stay, I dont honestly think he is good enough, yet, to make up a promotion winning central defensive partnership. Squad player for me next year....someone who can cover RB and CB positions.
LEEDS AND FOREVER PROUD TO BE !!
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 154882
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
Re: Bates on O'Dea
Agree Gurj we need pace throughoot the team. I still don't think Lees is quite ready for the first eleven yet, he is still learning his trade, all the same young Tom is a very good prospect !Gurj wrote:I wouldnt personally keep O-Dea at Leeds beyond the end of this season, nothing to do with the sending off, just that we need a really dominant and pacey central defender.
Whilst Lee's should definitely stay, I dont honestly think he is good enough, yet, to make up a promotion winning central defensive partnership. Squad player for me next year....someone who can cover RB and CB positions.
-
Genghers
- Superstar

- Posts: 5801
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:24 pm
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Bates on O'Dea
If we got in an experienced partner for Lees and a good (like properly good, not just passable) RB then I wouldn't mind having Lees start next season. He's done pretty well by all accounts this season, and he'll only improve with experience.
Really hope Colin doesn't persist playing him at full back though, he'll develop quicker if played in his more natural role...
As for O'Dea, he's proved a liability many times this season, you don't want someone who's going to get suspended 3 times (esp. when two of these have come for needless decisions...)!
Really hope Colin doesn't persist playing him at full back though, he'll develop quicker if played in his more natural role...
As for O'Dea, he's proved a liability many times this season, you don't want someone who's going to get suspended 3 times (esp. when two of these have come for needless decisions...)!
-
Emsley
- Superstar

- Posts: 7373
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:51 am
- Location: Leeds.
Re: Bates on O'Dea
I dunno, i reckon O dea could be a top championship defender.
But do we want to risk his development over our promotion hopes?
But do we want to risk his development over our promotion hopes?
WE''RE LEEDS UNITED, WE''LL NEVER BE DEFEATED!
Paul Green was warnobs best signing.
If you disagree please send me a PM so we can get in to a fight.
Paul Green was warnobs best signing.
If you disagree please send me a PM so we can get in to a fight.
- Gino 1959
- Superstar

- Posts: 11810
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:31 pm
- Location: Na Saoirsí (Baile átha Cliath)
Re: Bates on O'Dea
Same reason as he would refuse to go to Barca or Real Madrid92champs wrote:Well, since O'Dea's main alternative is to go back to a team who will probably win their league with ease and have little competitiveness, will he want to go back there?
Beware the fury of a patient man - John Dryden.
- Bakerjamessteven
- First Team

- Posts: 2461
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 6:49 pm
- Location: Rochester Kent
Bates on O'Dea
I agree 64, I don't think Lees is ready. Would make a good sub. need cover for injury's and suspensions.1964white wrote:
Agree we need pace throughoot the team. I still don't think Lees is quite ready for the first eleven yet, he is still learning his trade, all the same young Tom is a very good prospect !
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 154882
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
Re: Bates on O'Dea
I really rate young Lees but he needs more time !Bakerjamessteven wrote: I agree 64, I don't think Lees is ready. Would make a good sub. need cover for injury's and suspensions.